Jump to content

Daveincid (Inactive)

Members+
  • Posts

    1,871
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Daveincid (Inactive)

  1. vor 1 Minute schrieb dieu:

    I think that manager reputation should have a larg impact on transfers. Especially in lower leagues. I am sure you would agree that if Klopp or Guardiola went an managed a non-league club they would be able to sign players that said club would not normally be able to sign?

    No, this is still the part which I disagree, but any debate about this is useless as we simply both have our own view ;) 

  2. vor 6 Minuten schrieb dieu:

    Problem is that both were intended to be in the first team. One as a regular starter and the other as a squad player. I did not offer them crazy money, but the wage I offered was about the same as they are earning now at their new clubs.

    In other words they turned down an offer from a world class manager that offered them a  role in the first team on comparable wages , and instead signed for a club 2 and 3 divisions below. I don't find that very realistic at all.

    If it happend once I wold not react, but tHey are just the last in a long line of players where this has happened.  

    To be honest, neither of them are players that I would normally sign, but since I am really struggeling to get players that are better I am forced to sign less talented role players. 
    I am signing them because they are very good at what I need them to do, but terrible at everything else.

    My point is that the game has it's reasons why those players declined your offer. I only tried to explain some possibilities. I can't say what exactly the reason was. Therefore I would need the save-game. If this would be a bug, it would have been spotted way earlier because contract-negotiation is a core-element in Football Manager. If you really think it's a bug then it might be worth posting it here: https://community.sigames.com/forums/forum/849-football-manager-2022-bugs-forum/

  3. vor 4 Minuten schrieb DamianJMcGrath:

    But, would you expect a player to have a choice between a League 1 club managed by a world class manager and a Conference side, and for them to choose the lower side, at presumably lower wages? 

    If the offer isn't almost "immorally" high, then the lower side. There isn't any reason to offer those players a massive salary at all so, as I already mentioned: Those players ability will be on vanarama-level, otherwise those clubs wouldn't be able to sign him anyway. 

  4. vor 9 Minuten schrieb DamianJMcGrath:

    Do you not think some players might be attracted to Salford because of who owns them? 

    And players all the time are saying they signed for a club because they wanted to play for a certain manager

    No I don't. 
    Of course they are saying this, but this is usually after they've signed the good contract and not the bad one. Of course everyone says he would love to play under Pep or Klopp. They both managing clubs who are paying some of the highest wages worldwide. As soon as a player outgrows a specific club, he want to move on, no matter who's the manager, except they are paying him an incredible salary to convince him to stay. He will then say he stayed because of the manager/club. The main reason was the money.

  5. I guess those players wouldn't play a big role at your club when they got signed by vanarama-league teams.
    In FM22 (and I think already in FM21) you can't hoard a ton of players anymore and they are just happy. Those are young players who want playing-time. So they don't see valuable reasons to develop in your U23 team and prefer to play senior football instead. Beside that, a managers influence is very limited (but it exists) in this regard to convince a player to join a club. 

    I mean I wouldn't work for Tesla for 50k a year and only copy some papers just to say that Elon Musk is my boss when another company offers me 70k a year and a interesting job-profile. 
     

    vor 42 Minuten schrieb DamianJMcGrath:

    But a world class manager would give an immediate boost to a club. Not just part of a 5 year average. 


    Managers are changing the level where they work much more frequently as players. Take Sven-Göran Eriksson as example:
    He won so many titles in Italy or Portugal. Was also a manager of England or Man City. He then was a manager in Thailand for BEC-Tero Sasana. 

    I haven't heard that they signed any talented/well known player who thought: "I need to play for BEC-Tero Sasana, they have a manager who is known worldwide."
     

  6. vor 3 Minuten schrieb Damfonik:

    Will the fact that the German player speaks German, which is in the Germanic Language family like Dutch, have any bearing on the time it takes him to learn Dutch?

    Yes it will. So he will learn Dutch much faster as a player who speaks only Chinese for example.
     

    vor 3 Minuten schrieb Damfonik:

    Or is it down to the player's adaptability attributes, personality or random chance?

    Adaptability will also play a role. If he has a very low value, you might get a message that he's homesick. My experience is, that players with a low value of adaptability more likely fail language courses. 

  7. There is a dynamic hidden value called "youth importance". This value will climb if you are known to give youngsters a incredible amount of playing-time. This is linked to your club, so you probably see the impact after 2-3 seasons (mainly a better chance for talented newgens). The chance is very high, that this philosophy will be then part of the "club visions" aswell when you extend your contract. So short answer: Yes, it has an impact.

    It's also shown at your managers profile. ("Known for signing younger players for the first team squad"). So you might have a higher chance for draw the interest of clubs to sign you as a manager if they have the same philosophy.

    I hope it helped you a little.

     

     

     

  8. vor 9 Minuten schrieb Nicenoise:

    i don't want to be the man who denies the truth, but i did not see one since my first 2012 fm. thanks for educating me.

    I agree that they do not happen very often, because SI lowered injuries-frequency compared to real-life stats for about 20% (as far as I know). So it's a good example that sometimes realism/escapism isn't always strictly separated. :)

  9. vor 36 Minuten schrieb Nicenoise:

    they are all training injuries, so they are not

    1.png.f6e6e6ef09ccb9d159e39a79aee495d5.png

    Interesting...just that you know:
    1. There are 21 injuries which can happen to GK's in total
    2. For every injury there is a occurrence-% how many of them happen in a game and how many in training ( you can check those informations in the pre-game editor yourself)
    3. You are welcome
     

  10. vor 57 Minuten schrieb DaddyPig86:

    These certainly look interesting, I might give them a try soon.

    One question - do you fix the fact that Inter and AC Milan play at different stadia in game?

    This is most likely not a bug.  To add only 1 stadium for those teams would probably cause issues with scheduling or other things (maybe licensing as the stadium is called differently depending on the team. If not, it might be worth to post it in the italian-research-thread:
    https://community.sigames.com/forums/topic/557831-italy-data-issues/page/3/

     Cheers
    Daveincid

  11. vor 3 Minuten schrieb Metal:

    Yes they do, Haaland last summer put in a transfer requested and was valued at 100 million. The AI did not entertain any bids lower than that.

    Yet a international player in his prime is valued at 85 million and the AI offer 13 million. Are you telling me thats right or realistic? I could understand 60 or 50 million but 13 million. Come on there is no excuse for this

    Of course you need to take Haaland as example ;) The point is that most clubs simply do not have enough money in the first season to offer 100m€ or more. Except ManCity or PSG. They can/will buy Haaland for 100m€ because he's a worldbeater playing at a slight below worldclass club. Sancho isn't good enough for those clubs so teams like Real Madrid, which are constantly broke until Season 3 (unless they sell Vinicius Junior to ManC or so), aren't able to offer more money. 

    So yes, I am telling you that under those circumstances in the game, this is the realistic outcome. :thup:

×
×
  • Create New...